Skip to main content

In re Bradley

Citations

  • 70 A.3d 1189
  • 2013 WL 3466403
  • 2013 D.C. App. LEXIS 397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting Hearing Committee’s conclusion that respondent “seemed honest” because there was “no factual support in the record” for the Hearing Committee’s credibility conclusion and other evidence directly contradicted it
  • “[T]he Hearing Committee’s conduct was not deliberate because the Hearing Committee’s contrary finding was supported by substantial evidence and was thus owed deference
  • “[W]e generally defer to credibility determinations made by Hearing Committee members who are in a better position than either the Board or this court to assess the truthfulness of witness testimony.”
  • false testimony before the Hearing Committee is a significant aggravating factor
  • false testimony before the Hearing Committee is a significant aggravating factor
  • false testimony before the Hearing Committee is a significant aggravating factor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwelb, Thompson, Washington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.