S.D. California· 3/30/2000
In Re Mills
Citations
- 246 B.R. 395
- 2000 WL 306777
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that 401(k) contributions of 10% of debtor’s $36,228 annual gross income were a reasonably necessary expense for a fifty-six-year-old debtor with total retirement savings of $9,000
- rejecting a per se rule and determining that a voluntary contribution to a 401(k) plan was reasonably necessary on the facts of that case
- court allowed 56 year old debtor to continue finding his 401(k) plan at 10% of gross salary as a reasonably necessary expense
- 10% voluntary contribution to 401 (k) plan was a reasonably necessary expense
- debtor gave away money borrowed from retirement plan
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Louise Decarl Adler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re William M. Behlke and Dina E. Behlke, Debtors, William M. Behlke and Dina E. Behlke v. Saul Eisen, United States TrusteeSixth Circuit· 2004-05-20· cited 179×
- In Re Sharlene De Ann TaylorSecond Circuit· 2001-03-20· cited 26×
- Lisa R. Hebbring v. U.S. TrusteeNinth Circuit· 2006-09-11· cited 25×
- In Re ParadaS.D. Florida· 2008-01-10· cited 23×
- In Re GlennN.D. Ohio· 2006-02-07· cited 19×
- In Re BeckermanE.D. Michigan· 2008-02-04· cited 19×
- In Re VansickelE.D. Virginia· 2004-04-07· cited 17×
- In Re HillS.D. Texas· 2005-08-03· cited 16×
- In Re CoxN.D. Florida· 2000-05-16· cited 16×
- In Re AwukuE.D. New York· 2000-04-28· cited 9×
- In Re GuildD. Massachusetts· 2001-11-08· cited 8×
- In Re MerrillD. Oregon· 2000-11-21· cited 8×
- In Re RubioN.D. Texas· 2000-06-20· cited 6×
- In Re MendozaD. Arizona· 2002-02-22· cited 6×
- In Re EstesD. Idaho· 2000-09-20· cited 6×
- In Re BurtonN.D. Ohio· 2007-12-13· cited 3×
- New York City Employees' Retirement System v. SapirSecond Circuit· 2001-03-20· cited 1×
- in re:William Behlke v.Sixth Circuit· 2004-02-20
- Hebbring v. U.S. TrusteeNinth Circuit· 2006-09-11
- In re GamboaS.D. California· 2013-02-15
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Charles Ellsworth Krohn AKA Charles E. Krohn, Appellant/debtorSixth Circuit· 1989-09-21· cited 318×
- First USA v. LamannaFirst Circuit· 1998-08-26· cited 74×
- In Re CavanaughD. Idaho· 1994-11-08· cited 42×
- In Re GonzalesE.D. Michigan· 1993-10-26· cited 42×
- In Re ScottE.D. Virginia· 1992-06-23· cited 37×
- In Re AttanasioN.D. Alabama· 1998-02-06· cited 35×
- In Re FestnerE.D. North Carolina· 1985-11-01· cited 33×
- In Re CorneliusN.D. New York· 1995-12-05· cited 30×
- In Re FountainE.D. Virginia· 1992-06-23· cited 29×
- In Re MacDonaldE.D. Pennsylvania· 1998-06-24· cited 29×
- In Re HeffernanD. Connecticut· 1999-12-27· cited 26×
- In Re DelneroN.D. New York· 1996-01-05· cited 23×
- In Re EsquivelE.D. Michigan· 1999-09-23· cited 20×
- In Re RothmanE.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-12-17· cited 19×
- Gomes v. United States Trustee (In Re Gomes)Ninth Circuit· 1998-03-24· cited 19×
- In Re MooreD. Idaho· 1995-10-26· cited 19×
- In Re WatkinsW.D. Texas· 1997-08-06· cited 16×
- In Re AndersonNinth Circuit· 1994-04-12· cited 15×
- Smith v. L.C. Spurgeon (In Re Smith)Ninth Circuit· 1996-11-18· cited 12×
- In Re HaffnerD. Rhode Island· 1996-07-22· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.