Skip to main content
· 1/10/2008

In Re Parada

Citations

  • 391 B.R. 492
  • 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 207
  • 59 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 459
  • 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 127

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “when determining the Debtors’ projected disposable income, it is appropriate to exclude these deductions as the payments clearly will not be made going forward, and therefore will not negatively impact the Debtors’ disposable income.”
  • only facts related to debtors’ financial situation are relevant to Section 707(b)(3)(B) analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Laurel M. Isicoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.