Arizona Supreme Court· 2/27/1926
In Re Miller
Citations
- 244 P. 376
- 29 Ariz. 582
- 1926 Ariz. LEXIS 199
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interpreting article IV, part 2, section 13 of the Arizona Constitution reading, “[e]very act shall embrace but one subject and matters properly connected therewith, which subject shall be expressed in the title”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McAlister, Ross, Lockwood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 2011-09-16· cited 79×
- City of Fircrest v. JensenWashington Supreme Court· 2006-10-05· cited 59×
- In Re ShannonArizona Supreme Court· 1994-06-21· cited 45×
- State Tax Commission v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court· 1934-11-27· cited 39×
- Hunt v. Maricopa County Employees Merit System CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1980-11-03· cited 38×
- Board of Regents v. SullivanArizona Supreme Court· 1935-03-27· cited 37×
- Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme CourtArizona Supreme Court· 2005-10-05· cited 34×
- In Re LewkowitzArizona Supreme Court· 1950-06-29· cited 30×
- Barth v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court· 1932-10-03· cited 21×
- City of Sierra Vista v. Director, Arizona Department of Environmental QualityCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-04-29· cited 17×
- In Re LewkowitzArizona Supreme Court· 1950-01-16· cited 14×
- State Ex Rel. Conway v. VersluisArizona Supreme Court· 1941-12-22· cited 14×
- State v. L.N.A.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-08-31· cited 13×
- Kerr v. BradburyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-05-05· cited 12×
- State v. FridleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-08-14· cited 7×
- Morris v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1932-03-21· cited 7×
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama· 1978-03-22· cited 6×
- Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission v. BrainCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-10-24· cited 4×
- Opinion of the Justices No. 321Supreme Court of Alabama· 1986-09-23· cited 3×
- White v. Kaibab Road Improvement DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-07-01· cited 2×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McGuire v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa· 1906-07-14· cited 90×
- In Re Applicants for LicenseSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1906-11-27· cited 54×
- Van Dyke v. GearySupreme Court· 1917-05-07· cited 46×
- Edler v. EdwardsUtah Supreme Court· 1908-04-06· cited 37×
- State v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court· 1904-02-22· cited 31×
- Wheelon v. South Dakota Land Settlement BoardSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1921-01-28· cited 31×
- Roby v. SheppardWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1896-11-13· cited 30×
- Ex parte HoweOregon Supreme Court· 1894-08-02· cited 23×
- City of Crookston v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1900-04-26· cited 19×
- State v. HallWyoming Supreme Court· 1920-01-06· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.