In Re Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding, in the lien avoidance context, that tools and lawn equipment were household goods due to essential purpose in the maintenance and upkeep of the home
• using primary use analysis to determine whether an item is a household good for purposes of lien avoidance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Victor D. McGreevy Darlene A. McGreevy Debtors. Darlene A. McGreevy v. Itt Financial Services
  Fourth Circuit· 1992-02-05· cited 26×
• In Re Vale
  N.D. Indiana· 1989-01-23· cited 13×
• In Re Bowen
  E.D. Missouri· 1988-01-27· cited 9×
• In re Elst
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1997-05-09

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Lamar Barclay Pine, Sr., and Shirlene Tucker Pine, Debtors. Melvin Giles and Wanda Giles, Debtors v. Credithrift of America, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 1983-09-07· cited 102×
• In Re Robert N. Brown and Barbara Bex Brown, Debtors. Barbara Bex Brown v. Virginia M. Dellinger, Individually and D/B/A Dellinger Art & Antiques
  Second Circuit· 1984-05-09· cited 93×
• Lovett v. Beneficial Finance Co. (In Re Lovett)
  W.D. Missouri· 1981-03-17· cited 36×
• Simonson v. First Bank of Greater Pittston
  Third Circuit· 1985-03-25· cited 17×
• In Re Spears
  Sixth Circuit· 1984-09-26· cited 11×