Skip to main content
· 3/27/2012

In Re Mh2011-000914

Citations

  • 275 P.3d 611
  • 229 Ariz. 312
  • 2012 WL 1021927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a “hurried attempt to interview” a patient does not constitute an examination of the patient and renders the doctor’s affidavit deficient as a matter of law
  • stating physicians must detail their observations to satisfy the clear and convincing evidentiary standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Portley, Timmer, Gould

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.