Skip to main content
· 11/16/1993

In Re the Appeal in Pima County Mental Health Service Action No. MH-1140-6-93.

Citations

  • 863 P.2d 284
  • 176 Ariz. 565
  • 152 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 70
  • 1993 Ariz. App. LEXIS 256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding alleged due process violations were waived as arguments because they were raised for the first time on appeal
  • statute requiring explanation of treatment options does not require mental health professionals to 10 engage in confrontation with mentally ill patient
  • although involuntary-commitment statutes must be strictly construed, we will not do so if result is contrary to legislative intent
  • explaining we will affirm on substantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Espinosa, Druke, Hathaway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.