· 11/16/1993
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Mental Health Service Action No. MH-1140-6-93.
Citations
- 863 P.2d 284
- 176 Ariz. 565
- 152 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 70
- 1993 Ariz. App. LEXIS 256
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding alleged due process violations were waived as arguments because they were raised for the first time on appeal
- statute requiring explanation of treatment options does not require mental health professionals to 10 engage in confrontation with mentally ill patient
- although involuntary-commitment statutes must be strictly construed, we will not do so if result is contrary to legislative intent
- explaining we will affirm on substantial evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Espinosa, Druke, Hathaway
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.