In Re Mh-2008-000867

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that any confrontation right is found in the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause, not the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment
• finding that criminal cases addressing the Confrontation Clause were inapplicable to mental health commitment proceedings because such proceedings are civil
• stating civil commitment is “a massive curtailment of liberty” and requires due process protection
• the Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause does not apply in involuntary commitment proceedings under Title 36
• “’[D]ue process,’ unlike some legal rules, is not a technical conception with a fixed content unrelated to time, place and circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ryan v. San Francisco Peaks Trucking Co.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-08-25· cited 38×
• In Re Mh2010-002637
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-09-27· cited 15×
• In Re Mh2015-003266
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-09-08· cited 5×
• In Re Mh2015-002490
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-05-01
• In the Matter of Bilton
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-10-07
• State v. Perry
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-08-17
• In Re: Mh2023-004502
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2026-02-11

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mathews v. Eldridge
  Supreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
• Goldberg v. Kelly
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,926×
• Addington v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1979-04-30· cited 3,004×
• Wilkinson v. Austin
  Supreme Court· 2005-06-13· cited 2,479×
• Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroy
  Supreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 2,289×
• Maryland v. Craig
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,040×
• Vitek v. Jones
  Supreme Court· 1980-03-25· cited 1,747×
• Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-28· cited 1,441×
• In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered Person
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1995-02-14· cited 29×
• In Re Interest of SB
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2002-02-08· cited 14×
• In re MH 2004-001987
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-09-22· cited 10×
• W.J.C. v. County of Vilas
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1985-04-09· cited 9×
• In re MH 2008-001752
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-10-05· cited 7×
• Sabori v. Kuhn
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-01-13· cited 5×
• In Re Mh-2008-000867
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-07-30· cited 2×

Other cases named In Re Mh-2008-000867

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• In Re Mh-2008-000867
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-07-30· cited 2×