District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1/24/2008
In Re McMillan
Citations
- 940 A.2d 1027
- 2008 D.C. App. LEXIS 15
- 2008 WL 189816
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The trial court could conclude on this record, as it did, that a lawyer who represented appellant’s parents would have a conflict of interest in representing zealously the interests of their son upon whom they depended for support.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Washington, Farrell, Wagner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Natalie Khawam v. Grayson P. WolfeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-02-06· cited 13×
- In re SzymkowiczDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-09-17· cited 6×
- In re RipsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-05-15· cited 1×
- IN RE JOHN T. SZYMKOWICZ, JOHN P. SZYMKOWICZ, LESLIE SILVERMAN, ROBERT KINGDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-09-17
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-03-07· cited 7,016×
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 2,431×
- Griva v. DavisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-02-10· cited 73×
- MacK v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-02-23· cited 56×
- In re A.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-06-20· cited 42×
- Jemison v. National Baptist Convention, USA, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-11-05· cited 40×
- Derrington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-08-01· cited 26×
- In Re OrshanskyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-08-15· cited 25×
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-11-28· cited 23×
- In re M.D.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-08-24· cited 23×
- In Re BanksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-08-29· cited 17×
- Butler v. HarrisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-07-13· cited 16×
- Uckele v. JewettDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-05-23· cited 11×
- Mayers v. MayersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-10-12· cited 10×
- Alston v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-12-24· cited 9×
- Mayes v. SanfordDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-05-05· cited 3×
- Banks v. Committee on Unauthorized Practice of LawSupreme Court· 2003-06-16· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.