In Re Banks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• contrasting \the then-current [in 1995] version of Rule 49 [which] did not on its face encompass appearances before administrative agencies\ and the rule in effect \now\
• applying Simons to claims arising under D.C. law
• applying Simons to claims arising under D.C. law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Federal Marketing Co. v. Virginia Impression Products Co.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-05-15· cited 45×
• Banks v. Smith
  District of Columbia· 2005-07-08· cited 22×
• Bergman v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-01-14· cited 15×
• Baker v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-01-26· cited 15×
• Larry Klayman v. Julia Porter
  D.C. Circuit· 2024-06-11· cited 9×
• In Re Ditton
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-08-14· cited 8×
• Banks v. Kramer
  District of Columbia· 2009-03-24· cited 7×
• Benoit O. Brookens, II v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-04-05· cited 7×
• In Re McMillan
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-01-24· cited 5×
• Thomas v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-02-28· cited 5×
• Lori A. Saxon . Todd D. Zirkle and Jane Khoury and Olivia Baker
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-08-14· cited 5×
• Thomas v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-10-25· cited 3×
• Banks v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-06-14· cited 2×
• Banks v. Committee on Unauthorized Practice of Law
  Supreme Court· 2003-06-16· cited 1×