In Re Mba-Jonas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “factual and credibility determinations in the Maryland proceedings” precluded a finding of intentional or reckless misappropriation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Pye
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-12-27· cited 10×
• In re Krame
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2022-11-03

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Zilberberg
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-08-04· cited 198×
• In Re Anderson
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-08-02· cited 90×
• Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mba-Jonas
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-20· cited 41×
• Attorney Grievance Commission v. Cafferty
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-09-08· cited 23×
• Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mba-Jonas
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-12-04· cited 19×
• In Re Sheridan
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-04-18· cited 14×
• In Re Bowser
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-04-19· cited 13×
• In Re Weekes
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-03-11· cited 5×
• In Re Hook
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-12-14· cited 5×
• In Re Uscinski
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-10-01· cited 1×