Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mba-Jonas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming hearing court’s conclusion that there was no Rule 8.4(c) violation if “respondent did not have the intent to deceive” when the “offenses occurred due to sloppiness, not dishonesty”
• characterizing definite suspensions and indefinite suspensions with right to re-apply as “more lenient” than permanent indefinite suspension
• appeal filed solely for purpose of delaying foreclosure
• appeal filed solely for purpose of delaying foreclosure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).