In Re Mason

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The baseline test appeals to this Court as objective and fairly easy to implement. It is in accord with the statutory scheme of priority established by the Code and prevents the courts from legislating priorities as these debtors would have the Court do today.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Orawsky
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-05-02· cited 33×
• In re Stull
  D. Kansas· 2013-03-27· cited 12×
• In re Engen
  D. Kansas· 2016-12-13· cited 12×
• In re Knowles
  D. Kansas· 2013-11-04· cited 11×
• In Re Potgieter
  M.D. Florida· 2010-04-14· cited 7×
• In re Salazar
  D. Kansas· 2015-12-23· cited 3×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Amfac Distribution Corp. v. Wolff (In Re Wolff)
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-06-29· cited 119×
• Bentley v. Boyajian (In Re Bentley)
  First Circuit· 2001-09-05· cited 63×
• McDonald v. Sperna (In Re Sperna)
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-10-25· cited 51×
• In Re: Wayne K. Crawford, Debtor-Appellant
  Seventh Circuit· 2003-04-01· cited 42×
• In Re Saulter
  W.D. Missouri· 1991-10-25· cited 33×
• In Re Colfer
  D. Maine· 1993-10-06· cited 28×
• Matter of Tucker
  S.D. Iowa· 1991-07-25· cited 21×
• In Re Boggan
  N.D. Illinois· 1991-04-03· cited 20×
• In Re Anderson
  D. Colorado· 1993-04-06· cited 17×
• In Re Janssen
  N.D. Iowa· 1998-05-07· cited 15×
• In Re Taylor
  W.D. Oklahoma· 1992-02-25· cited 14×
• Eck v. Willis (In Re Willis)
  N.D. Oklahoma· 1996-06-28· cited 5×