Amfac Distribution Corp. v. Wolff (In Re Wolff)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing a four-part test for determining whether discrimination among classes of claims violates § 1322(b)(1)
• separate classification for business debtor’s insurance company and material suppliers may be permitted on appropriate facts
• on appropriate facts, a debtor engaged in business could demonstrate fairness of discrimination in favor of material suppliers and business insurer
• debtor curing default complies with § 1322(b)(1) when separate classification pays 78 percent of student loan debt and only 1 percent of unsecured debt
• disallowing the debtor’s favored treatment of insurer and business supplier

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).