Ninth Circuit· 6/29/1982
Amfac Distribution Corp. v. Wolff (In Re Wolff)
Citations
- 22 B.R. 510
- 6 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1282
- 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 3832
- 9 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 451
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing a four-part test for determining whether discrimination among classes of claims violates § 1322(b)(1)
- separate classification for business debtor’s insurance company and material suppliers may be permitted on appropriate facts
- on appropriate facts, a debtor engaged in business could demonstrate fairness of discrimination in favor of material suppliers and business insurer
- debtor curing default complies with § 1322(b)(1) when separate classification pays 78 percent of student loan debt and only 1 percent of unsecured debt
- disallowing the debtor’s favored treatment of insurer and business supplier
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hughes, Katz, George
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
86 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re 222 Liberty AssociatesE.D. Pennsylvania· 1990-01-04· cited 68×
- In Re Aztec Co.M.D. Tennessee· 1989-11-22· cited 61×
- McDonald v. Sperna (In Re Sperna)Ninth Circuit· 1994-10-25· cited 51×
- Meyer v. Hill (In Re Hill)Ninth Circuit· 2001-09-28· cited 50×
- In Re FrickerE.D. Pennsylvania· 1990-07-26· cited 46×
- In Re HuertaC.D. California· 1992-02-28· cited 38×
- Spokane Railway Credit Union v. Gonzales (In Re Gonzales)E.D. Washington· 1994-09-21· cited 34×
- In Re OrawskyE.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-05-02· cited 33×
- Itule v. Heath (In Re Heath)Ninth Circuit· 1995-05-15· cited 33×
- In Re Lion Capital GroupS.D. New York· 1985-04-25· cited 32×
- In Re AG Consultants Grain Division, Inc.N.D. Indiana· 1987-08-14· cited 32×
- In Re BrownN.D. Illinois· 1993-03-12· cited 31×
- In Re FurlowE.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-03-17· cited 30×
- In Re HogueS.D. Ohio· 1987-10-08· cited 29×
- In Re ColferD. Maine· 1993-10-06· cited 28×
- Mickelson v. Leser (In re Leser)Eighth Circuit· 1991-08-01· cited 28×
- In Re SimmonsN.D. Texas· 2003-02-04· cited 27×
- In Re HarrisE.D. Michigan· 1986-06-13· cited 22×
- In Re MendenhallW.D. Arkansas· 1985-08-13· cited 22×
- In Re WarnerC.D. California· 1989-06-21· cited 22×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-10-11· cited 695×
- Kelley v. Everglades Drainage DistrictSupreme Court· 1943-06-21· cited 255×
- New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1918-06-03· cited 179×
- In Re IacovoniD. Utah· 1980-01-21· cited 124×
- In Re KovichW.D. Michigan· 1980-06-09· cited 52×
- In Re DziedzicS.D. Texas· 1981-03-06· cited 41×
- Scherk v. NewtonTenth Circuit· 1945-12-28· cited 37×
- Seidel v. Palisades-On-The-DesplainesSeventh Circuit· 1937-03-29· cited 33×
- In Re GayD. Colorado· 1980-04-02· cited 29×
- In Re SutherlandW.D. Arkansas· 1980-02-29· cited 29×
- In Re MontanoDistrict of Columbia· 1980-06-02· cited 28×
- In Re ElkindD. Colorado· 1981-06-04· cited 28×
- Brockett v. Winkle Terra Cotta Co.Eighth Circuit· 1936-02-12· cited 24×
- Newton D. Bartle, Attorney in Fact for Creditors' Committee v. Markson Bros. Inc., Debtor, and New York Home Furnishing Corp., DebtorSecond Circuit· 1963-03-05· cited 16×
- In Re CragoS.D. Ohio· 1980-01-21· cited 16×
- In Re McKenzieW.D. New York· 1980-03-11· cited 15×
- In Re FizerS.D. Ohio· 1979-12-03· cited 15×
- In Re BarnesDistrict of Columbia· 1981-04-22· cited 15×
- Matter of UtterW.D. New York· 1980-04-15· cited 13×
- In the Matter of Los Angeles Land and Investments, Ltd., Debtor. Ralph S. Aoki, Trustee v. Laura C. Light, Claimant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1971-09-16· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.