In Re Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[a]n actual conflict of interest can justify total disallowance of fees, cancellation of a fee agreement, or a court can determine the effect of the conflict of interest and deny fees in proportion to the scope of the conflict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hale v. United States Trustee (In Re Basham)
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-04-21· cited 104×
• In Re Castorena
  D. Idaho· 2001-11-28· cited 58×
• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-05-06· cited 33×
• In Re Waldo
  E.D. Tennessee· 2009-10-27· cited 21×
• Messner v. Commerce Bank/Harrisburg, N.A. (In Re Smith)
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2005-08-29· cited 20×
• In Re Nieves
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2000-02-23· cited 17×
• In Re Busetta-Silvia
  Tenth Circuit· 2004-09-08· cited 13×
• In Re Perry
  D. Colorado· 1998-10-01· cited 12×
• In Re Bartmann
  N.D. Oklahoma· 2004-07-14· cited 10×
• In Re: Martha Sanchez, Debtor. Martha Sanchez v. Robert L. Gordon, Dba Gordon and Associates
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-03-05· cited 8×
• In Re McNickle
  S.D. Ohio· 2002-02-20· cited 6×
• In Re Lawson
  E.D. Tennessee· 2010-08-31· cited 6×
• In re Maldonado
  N.D. Illinois· 2012-11-13· cited 6×
• In Re Busetta-Silvia
  D. New Mexico· 2003-10-29· cited 5×
• In re Lindsey
  N.D. Illinois· 2018-04-10· cited 4×
• In Re Busetta-Silvia
  D. New Mexico· 2004-04-14· cited 3×
• In Re PASCO
  D. Colorado· 1998-03-31· cited 2×
• Hessinger & Associates v. U.S. Trustee
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-03-31· cited 1×
• In re Carr
  N.D. Illinois· 2018-04-10

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• United States v. Turkette
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 2,648×
• Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago
  Supreme Court· 1941-03-10· cited 359×
• In Re James W. LAND & Lois L. Land, Debtors. James W. LAND, Lois L. Land & Thomas J. Kerwin, Appellants, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ALAMOSA, Appellee
  First Circuit· 1991-09-10· cited 76×
• In Re Watson Seafood & Poultry Co., Inc.
  E.D. North Carolina· 1984-05-31· cited 64×
• Land v. First National Bank in Alamosa (In Re Land)
  D. Colorado· 1990-07-23· cited 41×
• Barton v. Chrysler (In Re Paine)
  W.D. Michigan· 1981-08-04· cited 32×
• In Re Symes
  D. Arizona· 1994-10-20· cited 29×
• In Re Whitman
  D. Massachusetts· 1985-08-02· cited 27×
• In Re Global Marine, Inc.
  S.D. Texas· 1987-09-28· cited 24×
• In Re GHR Energy Corp.
  S.D. Texas· 1985-07-20· cited 24×
• In Re Devers
  District of Columbia· 1983-06-06· cited 23×
• In Re Damon
  S.D. New York· 1984-05-17· cited 22×
• In Re Friedland
  D. Colorado· 1995-05-25· cited 22×
• Quiat v. Berger (In Re Vann)
  D. Colorado· 1992-02-05· cited 19×
• In Re Mills
  D. Arizona· 1994-06-30· cited 16×
• In Re Ochoa
  N.D. New York· 1987-03-27· cited 14×
• In Re Hessinger & Associates
  N.D. California· 1996-01-22· cited 13×
• In Re McNar, Inc.
  S.D. California· 1990-07-13· cited 13×
• In Re Mattocks
  E.D. New York· 1981-10-09· cited 11×
• Hessinger & Associates v. Voglio (In Re Voglio)
  D. Arizona· 1996-01-17· cited 10×