In Re March 9, 2012 Order

Syllabus

In a prior appeal, this Court affirmed dismissal of this case and remanded for the trial court to determine the appropriate amount of attorney's fees owed to the appellee due to the appellant's frivolous appeal. On remand, the trial court ordered the appellant to pay the sum of $11,901.35. The appellant then filed a motion to alter or amend, arguing, for the first time, that the trial court's order was \void ab initio\ because it was \adjudicated by an adjudicator with compromised neutrality in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment[.]\ As support for this claim, the appellant pointed to comments made by the trial judge during hearings in a separate but related case in 2010 and 2012. The appellant argued that the Fourteenth Amendment required the trial judge to disqualify herself sua sponte and that her failure to do so rendered all subsequent orders entered by the trial judge void. The trial court treated this as a request for recusal \embedded\ in the motion to alter or amend and denied the motion in all respects. The appellant has appealed. We affirm.