District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 6/28/1985
In Re Manville
Citations
- 494 A.2d 1289
- 1985 D.C. App. LEXIS 422
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- listing factors including “candor, sincerity and full disclosure in the filings and proceedings on character and fitness”
- evidence of past criminal conduct suggests unfitness unless rebutted
- evidence of past criminal conduct suggests unfitness unless rebutted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nebeker, Pryor, Fer-Ren, Belson, Ne-Beker, MacK, Newman, Ferren, Terry, Rogers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Matter of ShillaireDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-10-25· cited 56×
- In Re ManvilleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-03-04· cited 37×
- Scott v. State Bar Examining CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-01-14· cited 29×
- In Re DortchDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-10-21· cited 27×
- Matter of DortchWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1997-04-14· cited 18×
- Application of DortchCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-01-06· cited 15×
- In Re BakerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-08-14· cited 13×
- In Re PolinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-09-09· cited 12×
- In Re PolinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-08-27· cited 11×
- In Re DemosDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-08-09· cited 11×
- In re CogginSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2008-05-12· cited 11×
- In Re SobinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-11-10· cited 7×
- In Re MustafaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-09-16· cited 6×
- In Re KleppinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-03-22· cited 5×
- In Re WellsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-01-30· cited 5×
- In re DemosDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-05-26· cited 5×
- In re T.J.S.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1997-04-03· cited 4×
- In Re BlairDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-09-18· cited 3×
- In Re WattsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-04-27· cited 2×
- In Re McMillian's Eligibility for Conditional Admission to the Practice of LawWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2005-06-21· cited 1×
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court· 1957-05-06· cited 1,276×
- Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court· 1961-04-24· cited 535×
- Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court· 1957-06-17· cited 333×
- Heller v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals Committee on AdmissionsSupreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 92×
- Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1966-12-15· cited 81×
- In Re the Application of Allan S.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-06-06· cited 72×
- In Re CasonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1982-09-09· cited 71×
- Application of MatthewsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-07-21· cited 70×
- Matter of KerrDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-11-17· cited 47×
- Brooks v. LawsD.C. Circuit· 1953-12-23· cited 44×
- In re DavisOhio Supreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 41×
- Florida Board of Bar ExaminersSupreme Court of Florida· 1978-10-26· cited 35×
- In Re BeasleySupreme Court of Georgia· 1979-01-30· cited 34×
- In Re Application of G. L. S.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-01-07· cited 32×
- In Re Application of David H.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-10-23· cited 31×
- In the Matter of Admission to Practice of Anthony B. Dreier. Anthony B. DreierThird Circuit· 1958-07-30· cited 30×
- March v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-11-16· cited 30×
- Application of TaylorOregon Supreme Court· 1982-06-29· cited 29×
- Application of JenkinsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-11-10· cited 23×
- Martin B. v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1983-04-21· cited 19×
Other cases named In Re Manville
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.