N.D. Ohio· 11/17/2004
In Re Manouchehri
Citations
- 320 B.R. 880
- 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 2251
- 2004 WL 3185944
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the court has discretion under § 706(a) to consider whether case may be reconverted
- denying debtor's request for reconversion when the facts indicated that the debtor had acted in bad faith during the bankruptcy case by not cooperating with the trustee
- denying debtor's motion to reconvert based on the debtor's lack of good faith
- debtor seeking to reconvert, whose good faith has been questioned, bears the ultimate burden of proof
- the court has discretion under § 706(a) to consider whether the case should be reconverted
- “There exists a split in authority as to whether courts may exercise discretion in reconverting a case pursuant to § 706(a).”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Randolph Baxter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re BeckermanE.D. Michigan· 2008-02-04· cited 19×
- Povah v. Hansbury & Finn, Inc. (In Re Povah)D. Massachusetts· 2011-08-22· cited 10×
- In Re JohnsonD. New Mexico· 2007-10-29· cited 7×
- In re ShermanD. New Mexico· 2019-05-24· cited 2×
- Porreco v. Skiba (In Re Porreco)W.D. Pennsylvania· 2005-11-16
- Neely v. Smith (In Re Neely)S.D. Texas· 2005-11-22
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
- Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court· 1992-06-15· cited 884×
- Toibb v. RadloffSupreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 500×
- In Re James W. Barrett Peggy M. Barrett, Debtors. Society National Bank v. James W. Barrett Peggy M. BarrettSixth Circuit· 1992-05-21· cited 82×
- Nimai Kumar Ghosh v. Financial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re Nimai Kumar Ghosh)E.D. New York· 1984-04-04· cited 40×
- In Re PakurisE.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-05-11· cited 32×
- In Re StarkeyN.D. Oklahoma· 1995-02-21· cited 30×
- Copper v. Copper (In Re Copper)Sixth Circuit· 2004-09-24· cited 25×
- In Re TrevinoM.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-09-29· cited 23×
- In Re ThorntonS.D. Ohio· 1996-12-06· cited 21×
- In Re SensibaughE.D. Virginia· 1981-01-13· cited 18×
- In Re HannaM.D. Florida· 1989-06-01· cited 17×
- In Re CarterD. Kansas· 1988-03-22· cited 17×
- In re PonziniE.D. Arkansas· 2002-04-17· cited 17×
- In Re PorrasW.D. Texas· 1995-09-29· cited 16×
- In Re MastersonE.D. Pennsylvania· 1992-06-17· cited 15×
- In Re OblingerN.D. Ohio· 2003-01-06· cited 14×
- Matter of JohnsonD. Idaho· 1990-07-09· cited 14×
- In Re BrownW.D. Michigan· 2003-06-04· cited 14×
- In Re RichardsonM.D. Florida· 1984-10-24· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.