Skip to main content
· 4/4/1984

Nimai Kumar Ghosh v. Financial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re Nimai Kumar Ghosh)

Citations

  • 38 B.R. 600
  • 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 5949

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “a debtor loses all equitable and legal interest in real property validly sold at foreclosure whether or not the deed to that property has been delivered to the purchaser”
  • “Under New York law a debtor loses all equitable and legal interest in property validly sold at foreclosure whether or not the deed to that property has been delivered to the purchaser.”
  • court is not required to accept statements as determinative of alimony or property settlement
  • “[U]nder New York law[,] a debtor loses all equitable and legal interest in real property validly sold at foreclosure whether or not the deed to that property has been delivered to the purchaser.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conrad B. Duberstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.