In Re Manning

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that income was not exemptible where, “[a]s a practical matter,” the debtor was not subject to firing where his wife was sole owner of corporation and the debtor “sometimes did not take the salary if [the business] was running low on cash”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Zamora
  S.D. Florida· 1995-10-24· cited 13×
• Brock v. Westport Recovery Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-04· cited 7×
• Kane v. Stewart Tilghman Fox & Bianchi, P.A.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-07-27· cited 5×
• Vining v. Segal
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-05-05· cited 5×
• Sunshine Resources, Inc. v. Simpson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-10-13· cited 4×
• In RE McDERMOTT
  M.D. Florida· 2010-03-31· cited 2×
• In re IM
  M.D. Florida· 2013-07-25· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Edward Schlein and Kay Schlein, Debtors. Edward Schlein and Kay Schlein v. George E. Mills, Jr., Trustee, Florida National Bank
  Eleventh Circuit· 1993-12-02· cited 58×
• Magarian v. Southern Fruit Distributors
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1941-04-29· cited 48×
• In Re Malloy
  M.D. Florida· 1980-02-13· cited 18×
• In Re Montoya
  M.D. Florida· 1987-09-15· cited 17×
• Matter of Moriarty
  M.D. Florida· 1983-01-25· cited 15×
• Refco, Inc. v. Sarmiento
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-04-15· cited 12×