Refco, Inc. v. Sarmiento

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that debtor was employee for purposes of § 222.11 because his work was supervised and subject to the approval of his supervisor
• finding that debtor was employee for purposes of § 222.11 because his work was supervised and subject to the approval of his supervisor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).