In Re Lyons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The homestead is not a quantifiable interest; it is a classification of property under state law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Greene v. Savage
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-10-02· cited 100×
• Wallace v. Rogers
  Fifth Circuit· 2008-01-04· cited 55×
• In Re Mati
  D. Massachusetts· 2008-06-09· cited 19×
• Khan v. Bankowski (Khan)
  First Circuit· 2007-09-06· cited 16×
• Aroesty v. Bankowski (In Re Aroesty)
  First Circuit· 2008-04-10· cited 12×
• In Re Leung
  D. Massachusetts· 2006-12-06· cited 9×
• In re Corbett
  D. Massachusetts· 2012-07-30· cited 9×
• Rafuse v. Stryker
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 2010-04-21· cited 1×
• In re Meguerditchian
  D. Massachusetts· 2017-03-28· cited 1×
• Green v. Savage
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-10-02
• Utica Mutual Insurance v. Cohen
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 2014-04-04

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Patriot Portfolio, LLC v. Weinstein (In Re Weinstein)
  First Circuit· 1999-01-08· cited 106×
• In Re Miller
  D. Massachusetts· 1990-04-23· cited 43×
• In Re Rasmussen
  M.D. Florida· 2006-09-08· cited 31×
• In Re Maronde
  D. Minnesota· 2005-11-08· cited 25×
• In Re Agnew
  D. Kansas· 2006-11-06· cited 22×
• In Re Lacounte
  D. Montana· 2005-12-08· cited 20×
• Wallace v. Rogers (In Re Rogers)
  N.D. Texas· 2006-10-16· cited 11×