Skip to main content
· 10/16/2006

Wallace v. Rogers (In Re Rogers)

Citations

  • 354 B.R. 792
  • 56 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1323
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75826
  • 2006 WL 2956537

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[a]s a threshold matter, the court finds the language of § 522(p) to be unambiguous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fish

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.