In re Lovejoy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An early opportunity to appear before a judicial officer to contest the arrest fulfills any constitutional requirements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• In re Haynes
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-10-05· cited 2×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Baker v. McCollan
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-26· cited 5,659×
• Michigan v. Doran
  Supreme Court· 1978-12-18· cited 640×
• Puerto Rico v. Branstad
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-23· cited 123×
• Whittington v. Bray
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1980-05-19· cited 22×
• In Re Bryant
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1971-04-06· cited 14×
• In Re Hval
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-11-05· cited 13×
• Lovejoy v. State
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-07-10· cited 13×
• Juvenile
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-10-31· cited 11×
• In Re Saunders
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1980-04-08· cited 9×
• Cates v. Sullivan
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1985-02-25· cited 5×
• Moore v. Simonet
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1985-03-11· cited 5×
• Cates v. Cronin
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1977-09-26· cited 3×
• In Re Norse
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1966-02-16· cited 3×
• In re Ropp
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-12-24· cited 3×
• In re Hval
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-12-11· cited 2×