· 9/27/2007
In Re Lockheed Martin Corp.
Citations
- 503 F.3d 351
- 2007 A.M.C. 2304
- 68 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1598
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22829
- 2007 WL 2793112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that mandamus “may not be used as a substitute for appeal”
- recognizing that mandamus may not be used as substitute for appeal
- recognizing that mandamus may not be used as substitute for appeal
- recognizing that mandamus cannot be used as substitute for appeal
- stating that mandamus “may not be used as a substitute for appeal”
- explaining that mandamus “may not be used as a substitute for appeal”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Traxler, Gregory, Widener
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.