In Re: Dale Chimenti, Lizabeth Chimenti, Joey Chimenti, and Stefanie Chimenti

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the goal of the 'saving to suitors' clause \was to give claimants pursuing a common-law remedy the ability to choose their forum\
• noting availability of interlocutory appeal was merely one of several factors affecting court’s “prudential considerations” regarding issuance of mandamus
• granting the writ and directing the district court to remand the entire case back to state court for lack of federal jurisdiction and observing that “[a]lthough the availability of permissive interlocutory appeal under § 1292(b
• “[T]he failure to seek interlocutory review under § 1292(b) does not automatically preclude issuance of the writ of mandamus.”
• “In short, it is settled that actions brought in state court under the ‘saving to suitors’ clause are not generally removable.”
• “Section 1333, which provides a basis for federal jurisdiction in in personam actions if the claimant so chooses, provides no basis for removal if the claimant does not so choose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).