Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 8/16/2005

In re L.L.

Citations

616 S.E.2d 392
172 N.C. App. 689
2005 N.C. App. LEXIS 1798

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a nine-month delay in entry of a custody review order prejudiced the parties
concluding that a nine-month delay in entry of a custody review order prejudiced the parties
holding that the statutory preference for relative placement and compliance with the ICPC are not mutually exclusive
holding that this Court had no jurisdiction to review intervention order when appellants did not reference order in notice of appeal
holding that the statutory preference for relative placement and compliance with the ICPC are not mutually exclusive
noting that “had [DSS] requested another review hearing earlier or petitioned for writ of mandamus, some of the delay may have been avoided”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Geer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.