In re K.S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, although one of the trial court's findings was not supported by competent evidence, \the remaining findings of fact ... [were] sufficient to support the trial court's conclusion that ... reasonable efforts to reunify should be suspended.\
• remanding for further findings and clarification of respondent’s visitation rights because although trial court ordered visitation to take place according to “the visitation schedule,” record indicated that there was no such schedule or other visitation plan in effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re B.W.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2008-05-06· cited 27×
• In re: P.T.W.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-12-06· cited 10×
• In Re BW
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2008-05-06
• In Re KS
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2007-06-05
• In the Matter of Rc
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2009-05-05
• In Re Kmf
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2008-10-07
• In re H.B.
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2023-04-28

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re JS
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2004-07-20· cited 66×
• In re L.L.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2005-08-16· cited 46×
• In re D.S.A.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2007-02-20· cited 30×
• In re M.A.L.
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2005-03-03· cited 25×
• In Re Rholetter
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2004-02-17· cited 18×
• State v. Gary
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1999-04-08· cited 8×