In re Latifa K.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in dispositional phase, court concerned with best interest of child
• evidence not harmful because merely cumulative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Jennifer W.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-03-11· cited 26×
• In re Halle T.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-08-08· cited 19×
• In Re Tayler F.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-10-28· cited 13×
• Parker v. Slosberg
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-10-29· cited 13×
• In Re Stacy G.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-03-21· cited 9×
• State v. Vidro
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-07-16· cited 9×
• State v. John G.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-01-06· cited 7×
• In Re Luciano B.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-06-14· cited 6×
• In re A. H.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2024-06-03

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re Romance M.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-04-19· cited 113×
• In re Roshawn R.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-11-17· cited 109×
• In re Stanley D.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-12-26· cited 46×
• In re Romance M.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1993-04-06· cited 43×
• In re Amneris P.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-10-23· cited 40×
• In re Angellica W.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-07-28· cited 27×
• State v. Rolli
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-05-11· cited 18×