In re Angellica W.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting trial court’s correct statement that petitioner has right to amend and allege whatever she wants, but that burden is on petitioner to prove allegations
• social studies submitted for use in dispositional phase may be considered by court during adjudicatory phase

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re John G.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-11-30· cited 81×
• In re Kasheema L.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-01-25· cited 30×
• In re Latifa K.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-01-29· cited 26×
• In Re Anna Lee M.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-10-02· cited 20×
• In re Helen B.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-11-03· cited 10×
• In re Natalie J.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-02-11· cited 6×
• In Re Heather L.
  Connecticut Superior Court· 2004-03-30· cited 3×
• In re Isaiah J.
  Connecticut Superior Court· 2011-11-10· cited 2×
• In re Gabriel C.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-03-04
• In re A. H.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2024-06-03

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re Valerie D.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-18· cited 261×
• In re Rayna M.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1987-12-15· cited 173×
• In re Kezia M.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1993-10-15· cited 160×
• In re Tabitha
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1995-09-19· cited 144×
• In re Kelly S.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-12-01· cited 101×
• Newman v. Newman
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-15· cited 81×
• Hunte v. Blumenthal
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-23· cited 60×
• In re Carl O.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1987-04-14· cited 35×
• In re David E.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1985-08-06· cited 23×
• State v. Billie
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-02-17· cited 15×
• Annecharico v. Patterson
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1997-02-18· cited 10×