In Re Lane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Court declines to follow Nolan and Adkins and adopts the reasoning of those courts allowing modification of confirmed Chapter 13 plans where collateral, which the plan provided would be retained by the debtor, is liquidated during the term of the plan.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Davis
  S.D. Texas· 2009-04-10· cited 14×
• In re Ramos
  N.D. Texas· 2015-11-13· cited 12×
• In re Jones
  W.D. Oklahoma· 2015-09-24· cited 10×
• In re Scarver
  M.D. Alabama· 2016-08-24· cited 7×
• In Re Brown
  S.D. Indiana· 2011-07-08· cited 6×
• In Re Palmer
  N.D. New York· 2009-11-16· cited 4×
• Williams v. M. Bruenger & Co. (In re Brannan)
  D. Kansas· 2015-06-25· cited 2×
• Brown v. Ameriquest Funding II, LLC (In Re Brown)
  D. Massachusetts· 2010-04-19· cited 1×