Skip to main content
N.D. Ohio· 2/18/2000

In Re Lake

Citations

  • 245 B.R. 282
  • 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 346
  • 2000 WL 267064

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • hold ing that Congress did not limit the provisions of § 1322(e) to interest charges but also to attorney fees and foreclosure costs
  • “The amount of th[e] cure is determined by looking to two sources: (1) the existing agreement between the parties; and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pat E. Morgenstern-Clarren

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.