Skip to main content

In re K.S.

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 3312

Syllabus

Parental rights permanent custody manifest weight of the evidence R.C. 2151.414(B)(1) child could not or should not be placed with either parent within a reasonable time R.C. 2151.414(E) factors best interest of the child motion for continuance. The record contains clear and convincing evidence to support the juvenile court's finding that at least one of the conditions set forth in R.C. 2151.414(B)(1)(a) through (e) applied and that it was in the best interests of the children to grant permanent custody to the agency. The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Mother's motion for continuance of trial.

Judges: Kilbane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.