In re K.S.
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 3312
Syllabus
Parental rights permanent custody manifest weight of the evidence R.C. 2151.414(B)(1) child could not or should not be placed with either parent within a reasonable time R.C. 2151.414(E) factors best interest of the child motion for continuance. The record contains clear and convincing evidence to support the juvenile court's finding that at least one of the conditions set forth in R.C. 2151.414(B)(1)(a) through (e) applied and that it was in the best interests of the children to grant permanent custody to the agency. The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Mother's motion for continuance of trial.
Judges: Kilbane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court· 1984-04-18· cited 4,990×
- Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court· 1964-05-04· cited 1,845×
- State v. UngerOhio Supreme Court· 1981-07-01· cited 1,145×
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- In re CunninghamOhio Supreme Court· 1979-07-18· cited 599×
- In re Z.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-12-27· cited 335×
- In re N.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-29· cited 142×
- In re L.D.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-23· cited 80×
- In re L.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-11· cited 30×
- In re R.A.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-11-18· cited 17×
- In re B/K ChildrenOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-25· cited 16×
- In re A.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-18· cited 12×
- In re R.G.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-21· cited 11×
- In re E.J.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-27· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.