In Re Kevin K.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that ‘‘[a] person is in custody . . . if, in view of all the sur- rounding circumstances, a reasonable person would have believed [that] he was not free to leave’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]
• deeming state constitutional claim abandoned because it was not separately briefed and analyzed
• “in determining whether Miranda rights are required, the only relevant inquiry is whether a reasonable person in the defendant’s position would believe that he or she was in police custody of the degree associated with a formal arrest” [emphasis added]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).