Skip to main content
· 11/14/1996

In Re Katie S.

Citations

  • 479 S.E.2d 589
  • 198 W. Va. 79
  • 1996 W. Va. LEXIS 187

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[i]t is within the court’s discretion to grant an improvement period within the applicable statutory requirements”
  • holding that “[i]t is within the court’s discretion to grant an improvement period within the applicable statutory requirements”
  • holding that “[i]t is within the court’s discretion to grant an improvement period within the applicable statutory requirements”
  • holding that “[i]t is within the court’s discretion to grant an improvement period within the applicable statutory requirements”
  • holding that “[i]t is within the court’s discretion to grant an improvement period within the applicable statutory requirements”
  • holding that “[i]t is within the court’s discretion to grant an improvement period within the applicable statutory requirements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Recht, Albright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.