State Ex Rel. Amy M. v. Kaufman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prohibition was available to restrain courts from granting improvement periods of greater extent and duration than permitted statutorily
• recognizing 23 goal “to facilitate the reunification of families whenever that reunification is in the best interests of the children involved”
• \Prohibition is available to abused and/or neglected children to restrain courts from granting improvement periods of a greater extent and duration than permitted under West Virginia Code §§ 49-6-2(b) and 49-6-5(c) (1995).\
• ‘‘even where termination of parental rights is justified, a con- tinued relationship between parent and child by means of post-termination visitation may be valuable to the child’s emotional well-being’’
• ‘‘even where termination of parental rights is justified, a con- tinued relationship between parent and child by means of post-termination visitation may be valuable to the child’s emotional well-being’’
• “Prohibition is available to abused and/or neglected children to restrain courts from granting improvement periods of a greater extent and duration than permitted under West Virginia Code §§ 49-6-2(b) and 49-6-5(c) (1995).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).