In re Kane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Debtor, as proponent of his Chapter 13 plan, bears the burden of proof to show that his plan meets the requirements for confirmation found in §1325(a).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Amfac Distribution Corp. v. Wolff (In Re Wolff)
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-06-29· cited 119×
• Bentley v. Boyajian (In Re Bentley)
  First Circuit· 2001-09-05· cited 63×
• McCullough v. Brown (In Re Brown)
  N.D. Illinois· 1993-12-30· cited 54×
• Alexander v. Hardeman (In Re Alexander)
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-03-13· cited 39×
• Mickelson v. Leser (In re Leser)
  Eighth Circuit· 1991-08-01· cited 28×
• Groves v. LaBarge (In re Groves)
  Eighth Circuit· 1994-11-04· cited 27×
• In re Engen
  D. Kansas· 2016-12-13· cited 12×
• Marshall v. Belda (In Re Belda)
  N.D. Illinois· 2004-09-30· cited 11×
• In re Knowles
  D. Kansas· 2013-11-04· cited 11×
• Groves v. LaBarge
  E.D. Missouri· 1993-10-20· cited 9×
• Eck v. Willis (In Re Willis)
  N.D. Oklahoma· 1996-06-28· cited 5×
• In re Salazar
  D. Kansas· 2015-12-23· cited 3×