In Re Jumpp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the language of section 362(c)(3)(A) to be \less than clear\ and proceeding to consider legislative history
• \The thrust of amended section 362 is to burden the so-called `repeat filer' with demonstrating why the automatic stay should be extended.\
• “The thrust of amended section 362 is to burden the so-called ‘repeat filer’ with demonstrating why the automatic stay should be extended.”
• describing the legislative history as \sparse\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Jumpp
  First Circuit· 2006-12-28· cited 33×
• In Re Curry
  N.D. Illinois· 2007-02-22· cited 23×
• In Re Murray
  S.D. Ohio· 2006-09-13· cited 23×
• In Re Brandon
  M.D. North Carolina· 2006-08-29· cited 15×
• In Re Pope
  D. Rhode Island· 2006-10-03· cited 12×
• In Re Fleming
  D. South Carolina· 2006-06-30· cited 8×
• Jumpp v. Chase Home Finance, LLC
  First Circuit· 2006-12-28· cited 6×
• In re Martinez
  S.D. Florida· 2014-09-11· cited 3×
• Lattin v. Midland Mortgage Co. (In re Lattin)
  D. Nevada· 2011-12-16· cited 1×