W.D. Tennessee· 11/13/1990
In Re Julien Co.
Citations
- 120 B.R. 930
- 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 2406
- 21 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 58
- 1990 WL 177760
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “veil piercing or alter ego theory could not be a core proceeding”
- “[U]nless the court directs otherwise ... ”
- substantive consolidation pursued through adversaty proceeding
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: William H. Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rdm Holdings, Ltd v. Continental Plastics CoMichigan Court of Appeals· 2008-12-16· cited 120×
- Phar-Mor, Inc. v. Coopers & LybrandThird Circuit· 1994-04-11· cited 66×
- Chittenden Trust Co. v. Sebert Lumber Co. (In Re Vermont Toy Works, Inc.)D. Vermont· 1991-12-17· cited 27×
- Simon v. New Center Hospital (In Re New Center Hospital)E.D. Michigan· 1995-08-03· cited 23×
- Hudgins v. Shah (In Re Systems Engineering & Energy Management Associates, Inc.)E.D. Virginia· 2000-07-19· cited 14×
- In re PearlmanM.D. Florida· 2012-01-10· cited 13×
- Phar-Mor, Inc. v. Coopers & LybrandThird Circuit· 1994-06-06· cited 12×
- Kapila v. S & G Financial Services, LLC (In Re S & G Financial Services of South Florida, Inc.)S.D. Florida· 2011-01-11· cited 10×
- Sam Leslie v. Haig MihranianNinth Circuit· 2019-09-09· cited 4×
- Jobin v. Youth Benefits Unlimited (In re M & L Business Machine Co.)D. Colorado· 1994-02-16· cited 4×
- In re Archdiocese of Saint Paul & MinneapolisD. Minnesota· 2016-07-28· cited 4×
- Himmelspach v. Railcar Specialties, Inc. (In Re R.C.S. Engineered Products Co.)E.D. Michigan· 1994-05-31· cited 3×
- In Re MosesE.D. Michigan· 1998-09-09· cited 2×
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 3,187×
- Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 992×
- Unnamed caseFifth Circuit· 1987-08-26· cited 744×
- Caplin v. Marine Midland Grace Trust Co. of New YorkSupreme Court· 1972-05-22· cited 389×
- In the Matter of S.I. Acquisition, Inc., Debtor. S.I. Acquisition, Inc. v. Eastway Delivery Service, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1987-05-29· cited 276×
- Unnamed caseEighth Circuit· 1987-07-06· cited 271×
- Sampsell v. Imperial Paper & Color Corp.Supreme Court· 1941-06-02· cited 268×
- E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc. v. George Hadley, Bankruptcy Trustee, Inc., Trustee for the Liquidation of Gic Government Securities, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1990-05-24· cited 137×
- Village of New Lenox v. Union National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1988-02-29· cited 123×
- Koch Refining v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1987-10-07· cited 117×
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,803 in the Matter of Richard A. Kubly, Debtors. Wisconsin Department of Industry, Labor and Human Relations v. Marine Bank MonroeSeventh Circuit· 1987-05-11· cited 86×
- In Re Augie/Restivo Baking Company, Ltd.Second Circuit· 1988-10-24· cited 80×
- Henderson v. Buchanan (In Re Western World Funding, Inc.)D. Nevada· 1985-09-05· cited 77×
- In the Matter of Continental Vending MacHine Corp. And Continental Apco, Inc., Debtors. James Talcott, Inc. v. Irving L. Wharton, TrusteeSecond Circuit· 1975-06-05· cited 76×
- In the Matter of Majestic Energy Corporation, Debtor. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Majestic Energy Corporation and J.C. TempletonFifth Circuit· 1988-01-04· cited 66×
- Steyr-Daimler-Puch of America Corp. v. PappasFourth Circuit· 1988-07-25· cited 64×
- Chemical Bank New York Trust Co. v. KheelSecond Circuit· 1966-12-02· cited 62×
- Williams v. California 1st BankNinth Circuit· 1988-10-06· cited 62×
- Chittenden Trust Co. v. Sebert Lumber, Co. (In Re Vermont Toy Works, Inc.)D. Vermont· 1987-12-23· cited 37×
- In Re CrabtreeE.D. Tennessee· 1984-03-23· cited 36×
Other cases named In Re Julien Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.