Skip to main content
· 9/17/1996

In Re Joseph Borden

Citations

  • 90 F.3d 1570

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirm- ing the Board’s affirmance of an obviousness rejection where the examiner found “differences between the [prior art] and appellant’s design had little or no effect on the overall appearance of the design”
  • affirm- ing the Board’s affirmance of an obviousness rejection where the examiner found “differences between the [prior art] and appellant’s design had little or no effect on the overall appearance of the design”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rader, Skelton, Bryson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.