· 9/17/1996
In Re Joseph Borden
Citations
- 90 F.3d 1570
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirm- ing the Board’s affirmance of an obviousness rejection where the examiner found “differences between the [prior art] and appellant’s design had little or no effect on the overall appearance of the design”
- affirm- ing the Board’s affirmance of an obviousness rejection where the examiner found “differences between the [prior art] and appellant’s design had little or no effect on the overall appearance of the design”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rader, Skelton, Bryson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.