Skip to main content
· 12/7/1993

In Re Reid Harvey

Citations

  • 12 F.3d 1061
  • 29 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1206
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 31681
  • 1993 WL 500563

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “California law is clear” that qualified 13 immunity is a federal doctrine that does not apply to tort or civil rights claims under state 14 law
  • observing that the focus of the court’s inquiry into the validity of a patent is on its appearances rather than its uses
  • “the relevant question is whether the government’s decision to 13 defend on appeal the procedural errors committed by the ALJ was substantially justified”
  • “the relevant question is whether the government’s decision to 13 defend on appeal the procedural errors committed by the ALJ was substantially justified”
  • “the relevant question is whether the government’s decision to 13 defend on appeal the procedural errors committed by the ALJ was substantially justified”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michel, Newman, Schall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.