· 12/7/1993
In Re Reid Harvey
Citations
- 12 F.3d 1061
- 29 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1206
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 31681
- 1993 WL 500563
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “California law is clear” that qualified 13 immunity is a federal doctrine that does not apply to tort or civil rights claims under state 14 law
- observing that the focus of the court’s inquiry into the validity of a patent is on its appearances rather than its uses
- “the relevant question is whether the government’s decision to 13 defend on appeal the procedural errors committed by the ALJ was substantially justified”
- “the relevant question is whether the government’s decision to 13 defend on appeal the procedural errors committed by the ALJ was substantially justified”
- “the relevant question is whether the government’s decision to 13 defend on appeal the procedural errors committed by the ALJ was substantially justified”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Michel, Newman, Schall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.