Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 8/12/2011

In Re Jones

Citations

  • 652 F.3d 36
  • 397 U.S. App. D.C. 304
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16804
  • 2011 WL 3517913

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that plaintiff whose complaint is dismissed under Heck “has failed to state a claim for purposes of [28 U.S.C. §] 1915(g).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Rogers, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.