Skip to main content
· 11/19/2007

Davis v. Kansas Department of Corrections

Citations

  • 507 F.3d 1246
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 26802
  • 2007 WL 4099540

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “[o]n account of [inmates’] pro se status, we liberally construe [their] filings, but hold [them] to the same rules of procedure as other litigants”
  • observing that “[o]n account of [inmates’] pro se status, we liberally construe [their] filings, but hold [them] to the same rules of procedure as other litigants”
  • holding a pro se litigant “to the same rules of procedure as other litigants”
  • holding a pro se litigant “to the same rules of procedure as other litigants”
  • holding a pro se litigant “to the same rules of procedure as other litigants”
  • holding a pro se litigant “to the same rules of procedure as other litigants”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Murphy, O'Brien

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.