Court of Appeals of Maryland· 7/2/1969
In Re Johnson
Citations
- 255 A.2d 419
- 254 Md. 517
- 1969 Md. LEXIS 892
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the concept underlying juvenile proceedings is protection of the juvenile
- underlying concept of juvenile proceedings is protection of juvenile; judges think not in terms of guilt, but of juvenile’s need for protection and rehabilitation
- no violation of sixth and fourteenth amendment of federal constitution or state constitution's jury-trial guarantees
- “While [juvenile] proceedings are informal, § 60, the rules of practice, of procedure, of evidence, and standards of fairness must be observed.”
- “The proceedings of a juvenile court are not criminal in nature, and its dispositions are not punishment for crime.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hammond, Marbury, McWilliams, Finan, Singley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1971-06-28· cited 1,332×
- In re Victor B.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-08-29· cited 80×
- Matter of D.(daniel)New York Court of Appeals· 1970-07-02· cited 58×
- People v. FuciniIllinois Supreme Court· 1970-01-28· cited 56×
- Bible v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1970-01-16· cited 51×
- Wiggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-09-05· cited 49×
- Kawamura v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-04-09· cited 47×
- In the Interest of JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1977-08-31· cited 46×
- Moore v. MileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-01-07· cited 43×
- Matter of DavisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-02-05· cited 39×
- People in Interest of TMSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-09-14· cited 27×
- Raiford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-07-08· cited 27×
- In Re Anthony W.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-08-01· cited 24×
- In Re HamillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-12-29· cited 20×
- Matter of JohnsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-05-31· cited 19×
- BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc. v. RosenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-11-27· cited 18×
- In Re Ann M.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-06-02· cited 17×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-06-13· cited 14×
- In Re State of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1970-10-26· cited 13×
- In Re Delric H.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-03-27· cited 11×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 3,740×
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-03-22· cited 2,202×
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1937-12-06· cited 2,059×
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 1,167×
- In re StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1880-10-07· cited 85×
- DeBacker v. BrainardNebraska Supreme Court· 1968-10-04· cited 84×
- Peyton v. NordNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-02-26· cited 71×
- Bean v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-04-28· cited 71×
- In RE ESTES v. HoppWashington Supreme Court· 1968-03-05· cited 66×
- In Re WhittingtonSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 64×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-09-15· cited 63×
- Nieves v. United StatesS.D. New York· 1968-03-05· cited 55×
- Sas v. MarylandFourth Circuit· 1964-06-16· cited 43×
- Matter of Easton, IncompetentCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1957-06-26· cited 37×
- Blizzard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-09-01· cited 36×
- Sheets v. City of HagerstownCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-10-01· cited 28×
- In Re FletcherCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1968-12-04· cited 27×
- Dryden v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1968-12-13· cited 27×
- In the Matter of CromwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-10-08· cited 26×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.