Skip to main content
W.D. Tennessee· 1/9/2006

In Re Johnson

Citations

  • 335 B.R. 805
  • 55 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1032
  • 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 41
  • 2006 WL 51210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the court’s decision to grant the debtor an extension of the automatic stay was “superfluous”
  • “[w]hen read in conjunction with subsection (1), ... the plain language of § 362(c)(3)(A) dictates that the 30-day time limit only applies to ‘debts’ or ‘property of the debtor’ and not to ‘property of the estate.’ ”
  • “When read in conjunction with subsection (1), the Court finds that the plain language of 362(c)(3)(A) dictates that the 30–day time limit only applies to ‘debts' or ‘property of the debtor’ and not to ‘property of the estate’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: G. Harvey Boswell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.