Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 7/6/1976
In Re Johnson
Citations
- 359 A.2d 739
- 467 Pa. 552
- 1976 Pa. LEXIS 641
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- conduct punishable by summary punishment under subsection I of section 23 of the Act of 1836 need not be in the presence of the court
- conduct punishable by summary punishment under subsection I of section 23 of the Act of 1836 need not be in the presence of the court
- attorney not in contempt when improper remarks during closing argument did not delay or disrupt trial
- attorney not in contempt when improper remarks during closing argument did not disrupt or delay trial
- must affect the process of trial in some way such as actual prejudice to a party
- de-fense attorney’s improper remarks during closing argument which required judge to stop twice and give instructions did not obstruct justice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-05-05· cited 99×
- Commonwealth v. MarconeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-02-01· cited 87×
- Crozer-Chester Medical Center v. MoranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-06-09· cited 48×
- In Re CraneSupreme Court of Georgia· 1985-01-07· cited 43×
- Marian Shop, Inc. v. BairdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-01-08· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. RubrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-02· cited 36×
- Baugh v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-05-05· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. StevensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-05· cited 33×
- Williams v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-07-08· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. KrasnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-03-06· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. TroleneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-02-09· cited 26×
- In Interest of Tasseing H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-10-10· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. FalkenhanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-11-15· cited 24×
- Property Owners v. Pleasant Valley School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-09-15· cited 16×
- In Re CoganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-05-31· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. CameronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-08· cited 13×
- Vito v. VitoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-12-13· cited 12×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Falwell v. Di GiacintoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-01-27· cited 12×
- In Re JamesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-17· cited 10×
- In re November, 1975 Special Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-28· cited 10×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
- Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 1,330×
- Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1971-01-20· cited 732×
- Craig v. HarneySupreme Court· 1947-10-15· cited 697×
- Nye v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1941-04-14· cited 357×
- Office of the Disciplinary Counsel v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-03· cited 99×
- Commonwealth v. PATTERSONSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-07-02· cited 62×
- Schlesinger PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1951-06-07· cited 57×
- Levine Contempt CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-02-14· cited 49×
- In the Matter of ShigonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-10-16· cited 44×
- McLaughlin v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-11-26· cited 36×
- Mayberry AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-04-23· cited 21×
- Tenenbaum v. CaplanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-09-19· cited 17×
- In re the Rule upon ScoutenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1898-05-26· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. CherrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-04-07· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.