· 10/3/1975
Office of the Disciplinary Counsel v. Campbell
Citations
- 345 A.2d 616
- 463 Pa. 472
- 1975 Pa. LEXIS 1012
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding attorney's agreement to supposedly arrange for the destruction of nonexistent evidence reflected adversely on his fitness to practice law
- purpose of disciplinary proceedings is not punishment, but rather to determine fitness of officer of the court to continue in that capacity
- purpose of disciplinary proceedings is not punishment, but rather to determine fitness of officer of the court to continue in that capacity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.