Skip to main content
· 10/3/1975

Office of the Disciplinary Counsel v. Campbell

Citations

  • 345 A.2d 616
  • 463 Pa. 472
  • 1975 Pa. LEXIS 1012

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding attorney's agreement to supposedly arrange for the destruction of nonexistent evidence reflected adversely on his fitness to practice law
  • purpose of disciplinary proceedings is not punishment, but rather to determine fitness of officer of the court to continue in that capacity
  • purpose of disciplinary proceedings is not punishment, but rather to determine fitness of officer of the court to continue in that capacity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.