In Re Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “What makes the issue so difficult is trying to discern what interplay, if any, Congress contemplated as between subsection (b)(2) — the Means Test — and subsection (b)(3) — totality of the circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Crink
  M.D. North Carolina· 2009-03-18· cited 23×
• In Re Lorenca
  N.D. Illinois· 2010-01-29· cited 8×
• In Re Castellaw
  N.D. Texas· 2009-02-10· cited 5×
• In Re Dumas
  E.D. Texas· 2009-11-17· cited 4×
• In re Heath
  D. Colorado· 2016-05-26· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Maney v. Kagenveama
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-06-23· cited 131×
• In Re Thomas W. Price, Debtor, Thomas W. Price v. United States Trustee
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-01-07· cited 79×
• Pak v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Pak)
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-11-07· cited 44×
• In Re Parada
  S.D. Florida· 2008-01-10· cited 23×
• In Re Stewart
  N.D. Ohio· 2008-01-15· cited 18×
• In Re Maya
  S.D. California· 2007-08-14· cited 14×