In Re Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• striking down the Disciplinary Rule that prevented statements of being “ ‘a specialist unless and until the Minnesota Supreme Court adopts or authorizes rules or regulations permitting him to do so’”
• striking down the Disciplinary Rule that prevented statements of being \ `a specialist unless and until the Minnesota Supreme Court adopts or authorizes rules or regulations permitting him to do so' \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Peel v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 196×
• Ex Parte Howell
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1986-04-04· cited 3×
• Howell v. Alabama State Bar
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1986-03-31· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 2,526×
• Bates v. State Bar of Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 1,096×
• Bates v. State Bar of Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-27· cited 976×
• In re R. M. J.
  Supreme Court· 1982-01-25· cited 466×
• In Re RMJ
  Supreme Court· 1982-01-25· cited 400×
• Matter of Discipline of Appert
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-12-17· cited 16×