In Re RMJ

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that regulation is permissible when an advertisement is inherently likely to deceive or has a history of being deceptive
• holding that advertising may be totally prohibited when the content or method suggests that it is inherently misleading
• holding that when a state wants to prohibit false or misleading commercial speech that it must do so with less extensive regulation that a total ban
• holding that regulation is permissible when an advertisement is inherently likely to deceive or has a history of being deceptive
• holding that regulation is permissible when an advertisement is inherently likely to deceive or has a history of being deceptive
• stating that in order to regulate nonmisleading commercial speech, “the State must assert a substantial interest and the interference with speech must be in proportion to the interest served”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).